Face It Stevie. The World’s Not That Into You.

Apart from the Toronto Star and several non-right of centre blogs, the Canadian mainstream media’s coverage of Stephen Harper’s UN Security Council seat debacle is akin to the Chinese state media’s coverage of the most recent Nobel Prize winner, or the way South African state media and privately-owned newspapers defended apartheid during the years of Nelson Mandela’s jailing. The coverage goes from outright ignoring it – as today’s Leader-Post has done – to circling the wagons to defend Stephen Harper and Canada as the Globe and Mail has today.

In reality, this is probably the biggest diplomatic smack down Canada has received since the United Nations has been created. Some of the better analysis comes from The Galloping Beaver,, The Mound of Sound, Scott Tribe (Scott’s DiaTribes) and Impolitical.

There would have been no other good reason for two European nations to have seats in the Security Council – Germany won on the first ballot and Portugal claimed the second seat, after the second ballot, when Portugal was so far ahead that Canada pretty much gave up. It was no coincidence that Jim Flaherty got sent out for an economic statement at the time of the vote, in order to distract the national media with another shiny object.

Canada’s back on the world stage, right? (Canada.com) Given Prime Minister Eddie Haskell`s petty and vindictive nature, I think the odds of Canada threatening to withdraw from the UN sometime before Harper calls the next federal election should be set at about 5-1. The rest of the world has cottoned on to something that Canada`s Powers That Be are too scared to admit to themselves – Stephen Harper is a bully and a twit who would provoke a fight at an Irish/Ukrainian/hippie wedding – and an embarrassment to Canada on the world stage. Our diplomatic efforts are resembling Canada’s place on the world soccer stage (FIFA.com) – a joke to the outside world, and the subject of a bunch of internal politicking that nobody really cares about.

‘Twas not always thus. Whatever you could say about the government of the day, foreign policy was a Canadian strength – and the Progressive Conservatives did their part. Dief may have been paranoid, but after the Sharpeville Massacre, Diefenbaker was instrumental in lining up support to force South Africa to either renounce apartheid or leave the British Commonwealth (The National Party governing South Africa chose to leave the Commonwealth). And, as someone who has otherwise no love for The Jaw That Walks Like A Man, Prime Minister Mulroney’s stand against apartheid was also a brave and noble act, especially since President Reagan and Prime Minister Thatcher were more sympathetic to white-only rule. (sahistory.org) Yeah, he could have gone farther, but he went further than most of his contemporaries.

And we’re not even talking about Pearson’s Nobel Peace Prize for creating the concept of a United Nations Peacekeeping force, or our international reputation in peacekeeping or in worldwide relief campaigns. But under Harper, Canada has ran away from international commitments such as Kyoto and Copenhagen, followed a more unilateral policy, and last year Harper blew off a major conference at the UN – where world leaders were assembling – in favour of a photo op at a Tim Horton’s. (Toronto Star)

Do you remember a kid in middle school who was always cussing out one of the girls? Throwing snowballs at her, pulling her hair, knocking her textbooks off her desk, all because everybody knows e secretly likes her but is too insecure to ask her out? That guy hasn’t grown up – he’s just living at 24 Sussex Drive.

Harper juts around on the world stage, our own Mussolini-wanna-be. Mistaking bullying for strength and diplomacy for weakness, it’s not surprising that the rest of the world thinks that we’re going off our rockers, and should give us a wide berth until we, as a nation, get our marbles back.

Oh yeah. If four years of Conservative foreign policy can be undone by a 30-second quip by the leader of the opposition, then then just how badly has the Conservative government messed up the foreign affairs file? (CBC News) And why does the rest of the world heed Iggy’s word than Harper’s?

A MESSAGE TO OUR READERS The coronavirus pandemic is a moment of reckoning for our community. We’re all hurting. It’s no different at Prairie Dog, where COVID-19 has wiped out advertisements for events, businesses and restaurants as Regina and Saskatchewan hunker down in quarantine. As an ad-supported newspaper already struggling in a destabilized media landscape, this is devastating. We’re hoping you, our loyal readers, can help fill in the gap so Prairie Dog can not only continue to exist but even expand our coverage — both in print and online. Please consider donating, either one-time or, even better, on a monthly basis.

We believe Prairie Dog's unique voice is needed, now more than ever. For 27 years, this newspaper has been a critical part of Regina’s social, cultural and democratic infrastructure. Don’t let us fade away. There’s only one Prairie Dog. If it’s destroyed, it’s never coming back.

Author: Stephen LaRose

2006 winner of the Canadian Association of University Teachers's Award of Excellence in Journalism for a bunch of prairie dog stuff. Invited into the best homes in Regina. Once.

One thought on “Face It Stevie. The World’s Not That Into You.”

  1. “Our diplomatic efforts are resembling Canada’s place on the world soccer stage (FIFA.com) – a joke to the outside world, and the subject of a bunch of internal politicking that nobody really cares about.”

    Do you think people will care about the men’s national team 2014 qualification with this type of coverage? You are associating a “lame duck” soccer team (and within the mindset of soccer fans as fortunes CMNT go so does the broader soccer culture) with a PM who you criticize. You don’t say the team’s a joke, rather you make a subtler argument that I think gets made too often: ‘other people say were no good, so we‘re no good’. The problem with this argument is that it de-legitimizes supporting the national teams as pointless. If people don’t care, how can a team and program build support?

    Your evidence is Fifa rankings, a system full of variables that do not take into context issues in Canadian soccer. Fifa rankings are useless indicators of likely out comes in real games. Sure, CMNT is not a force even regionally at the moment but the reversal of that situation is not aided, in anyway, by popular coverage slamming the team. The average reader sees the above quote as, “right, we are awful at soccer.”

    Maybe you’ll support Canada when their at a world cup in the future, maybe the bandwagon will be built by then.

    This last qualification round we tied Mexico, yes that Green team playing in South Africa on your TV this summer, 2-2 in Commonwealth Stadium in an open, attacking game, in October, +8C with about 15000 people there. A good number supporting Mexico. Where were you?

    2012 Canada will play games, in this country, in a effort to be in Brazil 2014. That’s when the World Cup starts, qualification. If you, like so many companies, businesses, advertisers and media in this country, think any different, just cheer for England.

Comments are closed.