City Staff Say Okay To New Safeway

Received a fancy package from the city in my mailbox today. My real mailbox. The snow-covered one out on my front stoop. Within a big manilla envelope I found city staff’s recommendation to Regina Planning Commission regarding the expansion of the 13th Ave Safeway.

And, no big surprise, staff are recommending RPC approve Safeway’s proposal.

If you’re a regular Dog Blog reader, there won’t be a whole heck of a lot that’s new to you in this report. We’ve covered most of the details already. (A few times, in fact.) There have been some slight modifications to the plan though since the last public consultation in November.

The most noticeable adjustment will be to plans for the Retallack-facing (east) side of the building. (Tooting of own horn: the last time we covered this on the blog, I predicted this is where we’d see some last-minute changes. I knew this because I’m psychic!) Slated for that wall are ornamental pilasters, brick accents and a fake window like they already have planned for the west side of the building. The big ass Safeway logo that was going up on the southeast end is being changed to a logo and moved around to the south wall.

Alternately, the report says Safeway is willing to make that east wall the site of a recreation of the Bob Boyer mural (those horses currently on the west wall) if that’s cool with Boyer’s widow. (Word on the street is that it probably isn’t. But that’s a bigger story than I can squeeze in here right now.)

Now, if you’re still hating on the Safeway plan, or if you love it and feel the need to let the Powers That Be know, you still have a chance to have your say. There will be a special meeting of Planning Commission to consider this proposal on Jan 24 at 4pm in City Hall. Assuming they don’t send this back to staff to be rejiggered, the proposal will then go to council on Feb 21.*

After the jump, some of staff’s responses to community concerns. PLUS! My reasons for now being an enthusiastic supporter of this proposal!

* * * * *

In Appendix D of the report, staff list a bunch of community concerns about the project followed by their responses to those concerns. I thought it’d be informative to have a look at some of them. Since I’m going to be typing all this in myself, I’m not going to have time to do a really thorough job of this. But, you will be able to download a copy of this report for yourself Friday afternoon somewhere on this page.**

ISSUE: The proposed design is not sensitive to the area. It looks too suburban.

RESPONSE: Apparently, the staff has been trying to get Safeway to consider changes to their design that would satisfy the community but, “The applicant has been reluctant to deviate from the new ‘Lifestyle’ corporate image of Canada Safeway.”

That said, the report notes that many adjustments have been made to the design to reflect architectural features of noteworthy buildings nearby. Some call that honouring the character of the neighbourhood. Others that it’s a perfunctory gesture toward the local heritage architecture. Me? I get a boner whenever I read words like cornice, dentil and louver so my judgement is impaired.

ISSUE: The scale of the development is too large for the area.

RESPONSE: Basically, staff — like pretty much everyone else who gives a fig about this — wants to see there always be a grocery store at this location. And apparently, Safeway has indicated that “operation of this store with its current floor area would jeopardize its economic viability in the long term.”

Take that at face value if you wish. Or not.

The finished building will have a floor area of 38,110 sq ft and that is smaller than the typical Safeway Lifestyle store which usually starts at 50,000 sq ft. So, it could always be bigger, I suppose.

And while the expansion will necessitate the demolition of four houses (during a housing crisis) staff says that’s offset by other residential intensification in the area. Also, the increased footprint will allow for other on-site improvements like landscaping, corner plazas, re-orientation of the parking area and safer driveway access points.

ISSUE: Graffiti

RESPONSE: Yeah, it’s going to be a fucking problem. Blank walls get tagged in Cathedral constantly. But staff note Safeway has promised to paint over any graffiti within 24 hours. Which is faster by several years than Sask Power typically deals with the tagging of their electrical boxes. So there’s that.

ISSUE: The Bob Boyer mural.

RESPONSE: Safeway plans to tear it down claiming that an independent engineering firm estimates it’ll cost a minimum of $300,000 to maintain it and that that will come with no guarantees that the artwork won’t get damaged or destroyed during construction anyway.

Safeway is willing to accommodate a reproduction of the mural on the east wall but Mrs Boyer (Bob Boyer’s widow) has expressed that she would prefer it be preserved where it is but failing that “she would not care to have it replicated” and that “she would not feel right” in giving her consent to a reproduction.

ISSUE: Increased traffic.

RESPONSE: Staff says their Infrastructure Development Branch reviewed the proposal and they have “determined that the expanded store will not result in significant traffic increases in or around the site.”


ISSUE: The availability of on-street parking will worsen.

RESPONSE: Oh, boo fucking hoo.

Wait, that was my response. Not staff’s.

ISSUE: Loss of existing tenants.

RESPONSE: Staff say they have no jurisdiction over who a landowner rents to or if they rent space on their property at all.

ISSUE: Effect a larger store will have on small businessses.

RESPONSE: From the report: “According to the applicant, in its discussions with other Cathedral Area business owners who might be impacted by the enhanced services provided in the larger store, no conerns were expressed about a potntial negative impact on their continued business operations. The Administration has not received any expressions of concern from business owners who might be affected.”

There were a few more issues listed in the report but I’m running out of typing juice so you’ll just have to wait until the report shows up on the city website to read them for yourself.

* * * * *

Now, as I teased above, I have, in reviewing this report, become a big supporter of the project and I bet you’re wondering why.

Well, have a gander at this pic….

You might find this a tad hard to read considering it’s a photo of a photocopy of a printout of a scan of a photocopy of the original plans printed by P3 Architecture, but I’m pretty sure that the third item from the right — the one pointing toward the arched features on the second storey — reads: “LOUVERED RECESSES ‘GARGOYLE'”.

You know, when I was interviewing the Safeway rep at that last round of community consultations I mentioned that all he’d need to do to get me 100 per cent on board with the expansion was to add some gargoyles to his design.

And, boy howdy, the guy went ahead and did it! Goddamn gargoyles at my command!

So, true to my word, I am now a full fledged member of the New Safeway Pep Squad. Bring on the olive bar, I say!

As for my gargoyles (and I will always think of them as “my gargoyles”), I’m hoping they’ll look like this….

UPDATE 11:55pm — My wife has since pointed out, “Those aren’t actual gargoyles, you idiot. It’s just some stupid made-up colour name like seafoam or mojave butter.”***

Well shit.


* Even if an application is denied by Planning Commission, it is still forwarded on to council for their consideration.

** Of course, I hear through the grapevine that over 200 people are on the distribution list for this Safeway plan so I’m sure most of the Dog Blog readers who’ve been commenting on this issue received this report in their mailbox this morning just like I did.

Hm…. why did I write this blog post again?

*** The fourth item from the right indicates that the walls will be done up in Bungalow Taupe. “Taupe,” of course, being another word for “beige.” And, you know, that’s great because what every prairie city really needs is more fucking beige.

Author: Paul Dechene

Paul Dechene is 5'10'' tall and he was born in a place. He's not there now. He's sitting in front of his computer writing his bio for this blog. He has a song stuck in his head. It's "Girl From Ipanema", thanks for asking. You can follow Paul on Twitter at @pauldechene and get live updates during city council meetings and other city events at @PDcityhall.

23 thoughts on “City Staff Say Okay To New Safeway”

  1. I can’t wait to get my eggs from a place with gargoyles protecting them from evil foodborne illnesses!

  2. Hey Paul, by my calculations, with a 6m lane on the south edge of the site, and a 38,100sq ft building filling the site property line to property line, this will result in the 13th avenue edge of the building being moved about 20m further south. (i.e bigger parking lot, 30% bigger…) I have not seen this issue come up in the review, has it?

  3. When I was in there a few weeks ago, the man ringing in my groceries was actively (passively?) lobbying me for my support of the plan by gently dissing critics and talking up the design. Granted like most late-40, early-50-somethings in Saskatchewan, he’s a meat ‘n potatoes guy whose argument was based purely on function of the new design and didn’t seem to concern style or architectural compatibility with the heritage neighbourhood.

  4. Point is, there’s probably intense pressure from employee advocates of the plan to go along and to support it, while management probably gives the message that if you care about your job, you will support it, too. As for the union, it probably means a few more jobs in the two-tier Safeway union, so why would they care what the public thinks?

  5. Very sad about the laundromat closing. :( The last open day was a few weeks ago.. I’m not too sure on the status of Great Canadian Bagel and the hair salon? If they aren’t closed yet, they will be soon I’m sure.

  6. I think It wil encourage Cathedral shoppers to stay and shop in their own safeway, And in turn pop across the street and pick up fresh bread, grab lunch at the resturant or get their hamburgers at the butcher. To many times Cathedralites(?) go to big safeway to get their big groceries and shop at little safeway to get milk eggs and pop. I appreciate all the concern with the over all look and mural though. Safeway is good for our community and will continue to be good even after their giant renovation.

  7. Also have you been in that safeway in the summer? Cashiers have fans on the till pointing to their face because their boiling to death. Giver someone the choice: Do you wannna work in old crappy safeway? Or brand new state of the art with all the modern convieneces? Which would you choose?

  8. I knew the building would effectively shift south but it didn’t seem as dramatic as 20m from the images they had up at the open houses.

    I thought their ability to expand the parking lot was constrained by the fact that they’re keeping the actual structure the bank occupies? So the new Safeway will be flush with the front of the bank. That wouldn’t be a 20m move, would it?

    When Safeway met with the CACA they did mention they were expanding the parking lot but they said it would be only slightly.

    But, come to think of it, I’ve never looked at the before and after surface area.

    What about the loading dock area? Could that be widening dramatically and make up for the space?

  9. anon#6: I overheard at the bagel shop that they were given an extension on their lease and will remain at least until Feb 21. The hair salon has moved across the street to the west.

  10. Hey Paul,

    The distance from the north edge of the bank to the north edge of safeway is about 10-12m. So maybe that is as far south as the building face will move…

  11. #11 Pretty sure a few years ago they created 2 tiers, one for older employees (sweet wages, benefits) and a new one for new hires…pay closer to minimum wage, fewer benefits. I doubt this is the first you’ve heard of two-tier unions. Kind of like defined benefits versus defined contributions.

  12. @ Tania: “Do you wannna work in old crappy safeway? Or brand new state of the art with all the modern convieneces? Which would you choose?”

    It’s not an either/or question. The question really is: Do you want a faceless corporate brand monolith, or a really cool custom design on a rejuvenated store?

    That’s been the problem with the debate all along – black and white thinking and a refusal or inability to consider the grey scale.

  13. Paul: Ghosts use city services but don’t pay city taxes. Some progressive municipalities, like Portland and Calgary, have enacted Poltergeist taxes for haunted edifices. With Canada’s agin population, it’s a problem we’re going to have to deal with sooner rather than later.

  14. Dont ever question your reason for informing those of us who want to know about the development who may not be commenting on the issue

  15. The new plan has added a few new architectural details which are meant to reflect the neighbourhood, but the architectural design is still inherently dishonest: the false western fronts fronts have no meaning and no function; and even the windows are fake. The new plan is still too big for the neighbourhood.

    We are told that the new Safeway needs ‘theatrical lighting’, so no real light is allowed in. We went to the Southlands Safeway last night, and we found the ‘theatrics’ of the lights to be rather harsh. Are these theatrical lights really more energy efficient than fluorescent tubes which so cleverly complement the arched roof of a Marina Safeway?

    John Graham would or could answer why Safeway seems to be so keen to shed its own iconic Marina Safeway design. We did not hear arguments against retrofitting and re-use of the Marina Gullwing Safeway, nor were we told how this new branding would be more successful that the old branding.

    The destruction of the neon Safeway sign because “it too so costly to repair” (really?? ) shows that the Safeway corporation cares little about the opinion of its loyal customers. It would have been a simple thing to do, to leave their sign intact, so that some sense of history of place would remain, guarding a little bit of the heart of the community, where the streetscape would retain some familiarity. Alas, no! Not even that!

  16. 300 large to maintain a cinder block wall?

    Thats about 5 grand per brick.

    Where did I put my chisel?

  17. I am not positive the place you are getting your info, but good topic. I must spend a while finding out more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent info I used to be in search of this info for my mission.

  18. Pretty component to content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert that I get in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing for your augment and even I fulfillment you get admission to constantly quickly.

Comments are closed.