Climate change liars and deniers are increasingly desperate
by David Suzuki
The far-right Heartland Institute’s recent International Climate Change Conference in Las Vegas illustrates the desperate confusion of climate change deniers. As Bloomberg News noted, “Heartland’s strategy seemed to be to throw many theories at the wall and see what stuck.”
A who’s-who of fossil fuel industry supporters and anti-science shills variously argued that global warming is a myth; that it’s happening but natural (a result of the sun or “Pacific Decadal Oscillation”); that it’s happening but we shouldn’t worry about it; or that global cooling is the real problem.
The only common thread, as Bloomberg reported, was the preponderance of attacks on and jokes about Al Gore: “It rarely took more than a minute or two before one punctuated the swirl of opaque and occasionally conflicting scientific theories.”
Personal attacks are common among deniers. Their lies are continually debunked, leaving them with no rational challenge to overwhelming scientific evidence that the world is warming and that humans are largely responsible. Comments under my columns about global warming include endless repetitions of falsehoods like “there’s been no warming for 18 years” or “it’s the sun”, and references to “communist misanthropes”, “libtard warmers”, “alarmists” and worse.”
Far worse, in fact. Katharine Hayhoe, director of Texas Tech’s Climate Science Center and an evangelical Christian, had her e-mail inbox flooded with hate mail and threats after conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh denounced her and right-wing blogger Mark Morano published her e-mail address.
“I got an e-mail the other day so obscene I had to file a police report,” Hayhoe said in an interview on the Responding to Climate Change website. “They mentioned my child. It had all kinds of sexual perversions in it — it just makes your skin crawl.”
Another e-mail chastised her for “taking a man’s job” and called for her public execution, finishing with, “If you have a child, then women in the future will be even more leery of lying to get ahead, when they see your baby crying next to the basket [beside] the guillotine.”
Many attacks came from fellow Christians unable to accept that humans can affect “God’s creation.” That’s a belief held even by a few well-known scientists and others who claim to be climate experts, including Roy Spencer, David Legates and Canadian economist Ross McKitrick.
They’ve signed the Cornwall Alliance’s Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming, which says, “We believe Earth and its ecosystems — created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence — are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth’s climate system is no exception.” This worldview predetermines their approach to the science.
But if you think nasty, irrational comments come only from nut-jobs on the extreme fringes, think again: the gathering place for most deniers, the Heartland Institute, has compared those who accept the evidence for human-caused climate change to terrorists. Similar language was used to describe the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in a full-page ad in USA Today and Politico from the Environmental Policy Alliance, a front group set up by PR firm Berman and Company. The Alliance has attacked environmentalists, labour-rights advocates, health organizations — even Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the Humane Society — on behalf of funders and clients including Monsanto, Wendy’s and tobacco giant Phillip Morris. The terrorism meme was later picked up by Pennsylvania Republican congressman Mike Kelly.
Fortunately, most people don’t buy irrational attempts to disavow science.
A Forum Research poll found 81 per cent of Canadians accept the reality of global warming, and 58 per cent agree it’s mostly human-caused (both numbers, however, far less than the more-than 95 per cent of climate scientists who say climate change is real and probably human-caused).
An Ipsos MORI poll found that, although the U.S. has a higher number of climate change deniers than the 20 other countries surveyed, 54 per cent of Americans believe in human-caused climate change. (Research also shows climate change denial is most prevalent in English-speaking countries, especially in areas “served” by media outlets owned by Rupert Murdoch, who rejects climate science.)
It’s time to shift attention from those who sow doubt and confusion, either out of ignorance or misanthropic greed, to those who want to address a real, serious problem. The BBC has the right idea, instructing its reporters to improve accuracy by giving less air time to people with anti-science views, including climate change deniers.
Solutions exist, but every delay makes them more difficult and costly.
With contributions from Ian Hanington.